YesMadam, a Noida-based startup that offers home salon services, has found itself at the center of a firestorm of criticism after reportedly terminating over 100 employees following a workplace mental health survey. The decision, which was communicated via an email from the company’s HR department, has drawn widespread backlash online, with many questioning the ethics behind firing employees who admitted to feeling stressed at work.

Here’s what happened, how it’s affecting employees, and why it’s causing a major stir on social media.

The Controversial Survey and Firing Decision

In an attempt to understand and address the mental health of its workforce, YesMadam conducted a workplace stress survey. The survey was designed to gauge how employees were feeling about their work environment, with particular emphasis on stress levels. However, the results of the survey quickly led to a shocking outcome. According to former employees, those who admitted to being stressed in the survey were fired immediately.

One ex-employee, who chose to remain anonymous, expressed disbelief:
“What’s happening at YesMadam? First, you conduct a random survey and then fire us overnight because we’re feeling stressed? And not just me—100 other people have been fired too.”

The Email That Shocked Employees

Anushka Dutta, a former UX copywriter at YesMadam, shared a screenshot of the email sent by the HR department. At first glance, the email seemed compassionate, acknowledging the feedback gathered from the mental health survey. The message began positively, saying:
“Recently, we conducted a survey to understand your feelings about stress at work. Many of you shared your concerns, which we deeply value and respect.”

But the tone quickly shifted. HR Manager Ashu Arora Jha then announced the company’s decision to terminate the employees who reported feeling significant stress:
“To ensure that no one remains stressed at work, we have made the difficult decision to part ways with employees who indicated significant stress,” the email read, adding that the terminations were effective immediately.

The sudden firing left employees shocked and disappointed. Instead of addressing the underlying issues causing stress, YesMadam’s response was to eliminate the very people who spoke up.

Backlash from Employees and Netizens

The company’s decision to fire workers based on their mental health feedback quickly gained traction online. Many netizens were outraged, criticizing YesMadam for handling the issue in such a counterproductive and insensitive manner. Here’s what some of them had to say:

• Irony of Firing Over Stress:
  “Firing employees for reporting stress in a workplace survey isn’t just counterproductive—it’s the epitome of irony. Instead of addressing the root causes of stress, this approach sends a loud and clear message: ‘Your well-being isn’t our concern.’ A healthy work environment is built on empathy and solutions, not silencing voices by removing those who speak up. This isn’t fostering a supportive culture—it’s avoiding accountability. Companies must do better.”
• Is This a PR Stunt?
  Some critics questioned whether the incident was a marketing stunt gone terribly wrong. One user commented:
  “If this is a marketing ‘strategy,’ then whoever came up with this idea and the decision-makers who approved it should be the ones fired. If it’s not a PR stunt, then it’s a deeply troubling issue.” Others added:
  “If this is a PR campaign, then we’ve literally stooped to a new low! The whole situation has turned into a massive PR disaster. Either way, YesMadam is in deep trouble.”
• Heartbreaking for Employees:
  Several people also empathized with the fired employees, saying the company’s actions were heartbreaking:
  “I can only imagine how demoralizing this must be. You open up about your struggles, and instead of getting support or understanding, you’re shown the door. That’s just heartbreaking.”

Why This Is a Bigger Issue Than Just One Company

The controversy surrounding YesMadam is about much more than just one company’s questionable actions. It raises important questions about how businesses handle employee mental health and whether they are truly committed to creating a supportive work environment. By firing employees who admitted to being stressed, YesMadam’s actions suggest that companies may be more interested in avoiding uncomfortable conversations than tackling the root causes of workplace stress.

The Importance of Mental Health in the Workplace

Workplace stress is a common issue that affects millions of employees worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), stress is one of the leading causes of illness and burnout in the workforce. Employers are increasingly being called upon to not only acknowledge mental health concerns but also to provide solutions and support systems for their employees.

When companies like YesMadam take actions that punish employees for speaking up about their stress, it undermines the trust that workers place in their employers. A toxic workplace culture that discourages open communication about mental health can result in higher turnover, lower morale, and reduced productivity.

What Could YesMadam Have Done Differently?

Instead of firing the employees who admitted to being stressed, YesMadam could have used the survey results to open a dialogue about how to improve the work environment. Steps like offering mental health resources, providing flexible working hours, and reducing workload pressures could have been more effective in tackling the issue of stress.

YesMadam could also have introduced programs to help employees manage their stress, such as employee assistance programs (EAPs) or even team-building exercises aimed at improving work culture.

Moving Forward: The Impact on YesMadam’s Reputation

The way YesMadam has handled this situation is likely to have a lasting impact on its reputation. The backlash is already significant, with many calling for a boycott of the brand. As a company that appeared on Shark Tank India, YesMadam has a higher public profile than most startups, and its actions have drawn intense scrutiny.

This controversy could be a defining moment for YesMadam. How the company chooses to respond—whether through an apology, an internal investigation, or policy changes—will determine how they recover from this crisis. If the company fails to show empathy and responsibility, it could damage its brand image for good.

Conclusion

YesMadam’s decision to fire employees based on their answers to a mental health survey has sparked a wave of outrage, raising important questions about workplace ethics and employee well-being. Instead of addressing the causes of stress, YesMadam chose to terminate those who spoke up, which many see as an ironic and counterproductive response. This incident underscores the importance of creating a healthy, empathetic work environment and suggests that companies must do more to support their employees, especially when it comes to mental health.

---